|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
The world’s religions provide guidelines and fundamental principles which influence the moral views of many people. However, different religions and even different parts of different religions can give rise to opposite points of view concerning exotic species. Below are two examples based on Christian beliefs which argue for and against the control of exotic species. For Control: Religion tells us to continue the "good" work of creation, and this demands positive actions that minimize human impacts on species created by God. God created all things, so nature itself is sacred. According to the Bible, creation is a completed act, but God has a constant and loving interest in His creative work. He governs and sustains His creation. The created order is dependent on God for its continued existence. Man is God's coworker. Man's role can be seen as steward and manager. So we should cultivate all good things and "weed out" all the undesirable species. This view favors the maintenance of species and seeks to preserve habitat by actions such as the eradication of exotic species. So religion supports weed control. Against Control: Invasive weeds are created by God (or nature) and, therefore, they belong where they are found. In this view, everything is God's creation and He must have a reason for creating each living thing (even if humans have no use for some species). It is not in our interest to go against His actions. If this argument is valid, then we shouldn't try to control invasive animals like fire ants or noxious plants like purple loosestrife or even diseases like malaria, dengue, etc. Changes are part of God’s plan. See also the Role of Nature Back to the ethics page The 1st letter of the Password - L |
||
|
|
|||
